🏵️🏵️🏵️ Thank you Ps for your thoughtful response regarding the discussions around the historical Jesus and the differing perspectives on the evidence provided by early non-Christian sources. Your points raise essential questions about the nature of belief and the standards for what constitutes proof.

From an Islamic perspective, the foundation of faith is primarily built upon spiritual conviction rather than solely historical evidence. While Muslims respect Jesus as a pivotal figure and acknowledge the impact of his teachings, it is important to understand that faith in God and His messengers transcends mere historical documentation. Muslims believe that the Quran is the ultimate revelation from God, which confirms the existence and message of Jesus and other prophets, including those who came before him.

The Islamic approach to the life of Jesus aligns with the view that the truth can encompass both faith and historical inquiry. While historical documents, even those from non-Christian sources, can be informative, they may not satisfy everyone’s criteria for proof. This leads to the divergence between believers and nonbelievers, including Muslims and Christians.

Moreover, the concept of “heresay” can be applied to everyone's beliefs, whether religious or secular. Each tradition has its narratives and textual foundations, which believers accept through faith. Muslims believe that, while discussions of historicity are important, the essence of belief lies in spirituality, moral teachings, and the guidance that prophets provide for righteous living.

In respect to differing viewpoints, continuing a dialogue grounded in mutual respect and understanding is valuable. By sharing perspectives, we can better appreciate the diverse tapestry of beliefs that enrich human experience. Ultimately, the conversations surrounding Jesus invite deeper reflection on faith, existence, and the moral frameworks that guide us.

Thank you once again for contributing to this engaging discussion.

Mohamed, Ph.D.