Here are some opinions that I found on the article: 🏵️🏵️👇

I agree with the author that the freedom to read is a fundamental right. However, I disagree with the author's assertion that the freedom to read is absolute.
I believe that there are some types of material that should not be accessible to the public, such as child pornography or hate speech.

I agree with the author that the freedom to read is being eroded by the rise of social media.
However, I believe that this is a problem that can be solved by educating people about the importance of critical thinking and media literacy.
We need to teach people how to evaluate the information that they see on social media and to think critically about the sources of that information.

The author's assertion that the freedom to read is not as important as other rights, such as the right to safety or the right to privacy.
I believe that all rights are important, and that we need to find ways to balance them.
We cannot simply sacrifice one right in order to protect another.